Blog

Barber documented the mad dash to secure a 40-ounce Stanley tumbler in one of the limited edition colors — Target red and “cosmo pink” — and said other customers were “starting to argue” over them. The clip garnered more than 873,000 views.

Other TikTokers captured the lines — reminiscent of Black Friday — outside several Target stores in the early morning hours before the cups were unveiled. As stores opened, customers stampeded toward the Stanley display.

One video captured people frantically grabbing several cups at a time despite a disembodied voice noting that there was a limit of two cups per person.

Target did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.

The fervor for Stanley-branded drinkware isn’t surprising, given their cult status among young people. But the chaos captured in these viral videos could also be, in part, a result of how profitable the resale market for them has become — especially for limited edition colors of its largest tumblers.

Within days of its release, listings on eBay and Poshmark showed the red and pink cups going for over $100. One Poshmark seller already sold a set of the two cups for $190.

Despite their shiny profit margins, many commenters on TikTok say they’re appalled and “embarrassed” by such behavior.

“Grown ass adults behaving like 2 year Olds over a cup. it’s a cup,” one person wrote. “This is almost as embarrassing as rae dunn people,” another said, referring to the aggression some customers showed trying to secure Rae Dunn home goods at T.J. Maxx stores.

Stanley obsession has seemingly hit a fever pitch. But a youth consumer trend analyst recently told Business Insider that she thinks this is the zenith of its hype, and she predicts that the Stanley tumbler will no longer be as coveted in the coming months and years.

“They are absolutely on their way out. This is peak Stanley. There’s no up from here,” Casey Lewis told BI’s Katie Noutopoulos.

Stanley did not immediately respond to a request for comment from BI.

• Harvard Corporation says it accepts now-former President Claudine Gay’s resignation “with sorrow.”
• Gay showed “resilience in the face of deeply personal and sustained attacks,” a statement says.
• The search for new a president will begin “in due course,” the board says.

After weeks of controversy, including accusations of plagiarism and criticism for her response to a question about Jewish genocide during a congressional hearing, Claudine Gay has stepped down as president of Harvard University.

Her resignation was accepted “with sorrow” by the Harvard Corporation, one of the university’s two governing boards.

Gay, the first Black president of Harvard, took over in July of last year. She — alongside the presidents of MIT and the University of Pennsylvania — faced criticism after a disastrous congressional testimony that saw her waffle on whether calls for Jewish genocide violated school policy.

Gay, facing calls for resignation, later apologized for the answer. (Penn’s president resigned in December; MIT’s remains.)

More recently, past plagiarism accusations against Gay came to light. While the Harvard Corporation and faculty members backed Gay, the pressure continued. Gay appeared to allude to the plagiarism allegations in her resignation letter.

She also said that it was “frightening to be subjected to personal attacks and threats fueled by racial animus,” which the Harvard Corporation also seemed to address in its statement.

The full statement from the Harvard Corporation reads:

Dear Members of the Harvard Community,

With great sadness, we write in light of President Claudine Gay’s message announcing her intention to step down from the presidency and resume her faculty position at Harvard.

First and foremost, we thank President Gay for her deep and unwavering commitment to Harvard and to the pursuit of academic excellence. Throughout her long and distinguished leadership as Dean of Social Science then as Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences – where she skillfully led the FAS through the COVID-19 pandemic and pursued ambitious new academic initiatives in areas such as quantum science and inequality – she demonstrated the insight, decisiveness, and empathy that are her hallmark. She believes passionately in Harvard’s mission of education and research, and she cares profoundly about the people whose talents, ideas, and energy drive Harvard. She has devoted her career to an institution whose ideals and priorities she has worked tirelessly to advance, and we are grateful for the extraordinary contributions she has made – and will continue to make – as a leader, a teacher, a scholar, a mentor, and an inspiration to many.

We are also grateful to Alan M. Garber, Provost and Chief Academic Officer, who has served with distinction in that role for the past twelve years – and who has agreed to serve as Interim President until a new leader for Harvard is identified and takes office. An economist and a physician, he is a distinguished and wide-ranging scholar with appointments at Harvard Medical School, Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences, the Harvard Kennedy School of Government, and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. We are fortunate to have someone of Alan’s broad and deep experience, incisive judgment, collaborative style, and extraordinary institutional knowledge to carry forward key priorities and to guide   the university through this interim period.

These past several months have seen Harvard and higher education face a series of sustained and unprecedented challenges. In the face of escalating controversy and conflict, President Gay and the Fellows have sought to be guided by the best interests of the institution whose future progress and well-being we are together committed to uphold. Her own message conveying her intention to step down eloquently underscores what those who have worked with her have long known – her commitment to the institution and its mission is deep and selfless. It is with that overarching consideration in mind that we have accepted her resignation.

We do so with sorrow. While President Gay has acknowledged missteps and has taken responsibility for them, it is also true that she has shown remarkable resilience in the face of deeply personal and sustained attacks. While some of this has played out in the public domain, much of it has taken the form of repugnant and in some cases racist vitriol directed at her through disgraceful emails and phone calls. We condemn such attacks in the strongest possible terms.

The search for a new president of the university will begin in due course. We will be in further touch about the process, which will include broad engagement and consultation with the Harvard community in the time ahead.

For today, we close by reiterating our gratitude to President Gay for her devoted service to Harvard, as well as to Provost Garber for his willingness to lead the university through the interim period to come. We also extend our thanks to all of you for your continuing commitment to Harvard’s vital educational and research mission – and to core values of excellence, inclusiveness, and free inquiry and expression. At a time when strife and division are so prevalent in our nation and our world, embracing and advancing that mission – in a spirit of common purpose — has never been more important. We live in difficult and troubling times, and formidable challenges lie ahead. May our community, with its long history of rising through change and through storm, find new ways to meet those challenges together, and to affirm Harvard’s commitment to generating knowledge, pursuing truth, and contributing through scholarship and education to a better world.

The Fellows of Harvard College
 
Penny Pritzker, Senior Fellow
Timothy R. Barakett, Treasurer
Kenneth I. Chenault
Mariano-Florentino (Tino) Cuéllar
Paul J. Finnegan
Biddy Martin
Karen Gordon Mills
Diana L. Nelson
Tracy P. Palandjian
Shirley M. Tilghman
Theodore V. Wells, Jr.

Russia’s state-run media service TASS reported the politician was found dead in Toblosk, the city where he lived. Baza, an unofficial Telegram channel with links to national security services, clarified that the politician was found dead in the courtyard outside his home, per CNN’s report.

An autopsy is underway to confirm details of Egorov’s death, which couldn’t be confirmed by investigators at the time, Kommersant reported. Investigators found no “external signs of criminal death” on his body, the outlet said.

Egorov’s death adds to a string of mysterious high-profile deaths in Russia, which include public figures and prominent businessmen falling out of windows, death by suicide, or otherwise dying of unclear or bizarre circumstances.

Some of those figures have been noted to be vocal critics of Putin. Patel Antov, a policymaker who criticized Russia’s war with Ukraine, died falling from a hotel window in late 2022.

Ravil Maganov, an energy oligarch who was also critical of Russia’s war, died falling out of the window of a hospital room, which law enforcement said was likely a suicide.

But not all of those who have died under mysterious circumstances were overtly anti-Putin. Anna Tsareva, an editor at a pro-Putin newspaper who was found dead in her apartment in mid-December, TASS originally reported. Her death comes about a year after the death of her boss, editor-in-chief Vladimir Nikolayevich Sungorkin, who was also known to be a Putin supporter.

“Reese’s Pieces Pumpkins are pictured on the product label as containing carved out eyes and a mouth as follows,” the lawsuit says. “However, the actual Reese’s Peanut Butter Pumpkins product contains no carvings for the eyes and mouth.”

Hershey did not immediately return a request for comment from Business Insider on Sunday.

The lawsuit also takes issue with the Reese’s Peanut Butter Footballs, which have carved out laces on their packaging, but instead “look like an egg” when viewing the actual product.

The complaint claims that the products’ labels are “materially misleading” and that “numerous consumers have been tricked and misled” by their packaging.

The suit includes links to several YouTube videos of people who opened Reese’s products and were disappointed in the product inside compared to the one pictured.

“Reese’s what are you doing! Look at the picture on the packet. It’s like a pumpkin with faces and a little mouth — then you open up the packet and you are presented with that monstrosity,” the lawsuit quotes from one YouTube reviewer.

The lawsuit also quotes another reviewer who said they were “a little disappointed” to find that the pumpkin had no face carved into it and was instead a “chocolate blob”.”

The lawsuit alleges that Hershey changed the packaging of Reese’s products to “boost sales and revenues” within the last three years.

Consumers are suing brands for what they say is deceptive advertising

Hershey is not the only company slapped with a class-action lawsuit for misleading advertising this year.

In March, a man sued Buffalo Wild Wings claiming the restaurant’s “boneless wings” were “more akin” to chicken nuggets.

Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor, previously told BI that the suit against Buffalo Wild Wings is weak because in order to justify a class action lawsuit, damages have to be “substantial.”

“You’re getting all white meat chicken breast,” Rahmani said. “Have you really suffered any damage?”

Kelly’s lawsuit against Hershey claims that it falls under the class action jurisdiction because the “matter in controversy” exceeds the amount of $5 million and affects more than 100 people.